Model Comparison

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-4o

Anthropic vs OpenAI

Anthropic's Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) costs more but its benchmark edge makes it better value per dollar.

Data last updated March 4, 2026

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) costs more, but its benchmark advantage earns it better value per intelligence point than GPT-4o. Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) costs $0.03 per request vs $0.0225 for GPT-4o (at 5K input / 1K output tokens). GPT-4o generates tokens at 117/sec vs Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)'s 48/sec. The question is whether Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)'s higher scores justify paying 33% more.

Benchmarks & Performance

Metric Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) GPT-4o
Intelligence Index 33.0 17.3
MMLU-Pro 0.8 0.8
GPQA 0.7 0.5
AIME 0.4 0.2
Output tokens/sec 48.5 116.8
Time to first token 1.03s 0.44s
Context window 200,000 128,000

Pricing per 1M Tokens

List prices as published by the provider. Not adjusted for token efficiency.

Metric Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) GPT-4o
Input price / 1M tokens $3.00 $2.50
Output price / 1M tokens $15.00 $10.00
Cache hit price / 1M tokens $0.30 $1.25

Intelligence vs Price

15 20 25 30 35 40 $0.002 $0.005 $0.01 $0.02 $0.05 Typical request cost (5K input + 1K output) Intelligence Index Gemini 2.5 Pro DeepSeek R1 0528 GPT-4.1 GPT-4.1 mini Claude 4.5 Sonn... Gemini 2.5 Flas... Grok 3 mini Rea... Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) GPT-4o
Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) GPT-4o Other models

Value Analysis

Cost per IQ point based on a typical request of 5,000 input and 1,000 output tokens.

Cheaper (list price)

GPT-4o

Higher Benchmarks

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)

Better Value ($/IQ point)

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)

$0.0009 / IQ point

GPT-4o

$0.0013 / IQ point

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the price difference between Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) and GPT-4o?

GPT-4o is 33% cheaper per request than Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning). GPT-4o is cheaper on both input ($2.5/M vs $3.0/M) and output ($10.0/M vs $15.0/M). The 33% price gap matters at scale but is less significant for low-volume use cases. This comparison assumes a typical request of 5,000 input and 1,000 output tokens (5:1 ratio). Actual ratios vary by workload — chat and completion tasks typically run 2:1, code review around 3:1, document analysis and summarization 10:1 to 50:1, and embedding workloads are pure input with no output tokens.

How much does Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) outperform GPT-4o on benchmarks?

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) scores higher overall (33.0 vs 17.3). Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) leads on MMLU-Pro (0.84 vs 0.75), GPQA (0.68 vs 0.54), AIME (0.41 vs 0.15). If mathematical reasoning matters, Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)'s AIME score of 0.41 gives it an edge.

Which generates output faster, Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) or GPT-4o?

GPT-4o is 141% faster at 116.8 tokens per second compared to Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) at 48.5 tokens per second. GPT-4o also starts generating sooner at 0.44s vs 1.03s time to first token. The speed difference matters for chatbots but is less relevant in batch processing.

Which has a larger context window, Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) or GPT-4o?

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) has a 56% larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs GPT-4o at 128,000 tokens. That's roughly 266 vs 170 pages of text. The extra context capacity in Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) matters for document analysis and long conversations.

Which model is better value for money, Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) or GPT-4o?

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) offers 43% better value at $0.0009 per intelligence point compared to GPT-4o at $0.0013. GPT-4o is cheaper, but Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)'s higher benchmark scores give it more intelligence per dollar. You don't sacrifice quality to save money with Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning).

Which model benefits more from prompt caching, Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) or GPT-4o?

With prompt caching, GPT-4o and Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) cost about the same per request. Caching saves 45% on Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) and 28% on GPT-4o compared to standard input prices. Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) benefits more from caching. If your workload has repetitive prompts, Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)'s cache discount gives it a bigger cost advantage than list prices suggest.

Pricing verified against official vendor documentation. Updated daily. See our methodology.

Related Comparisons

Stop guessing. Start measuring.

Create an account, install the SDK, and see your first margin data in minutes.

See My Margin Data

No credit card required