Model Comparison

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-4o

Anthropic vs OpenAI

OpenAI's GPT-4o costs less per intelligence point, even though Anthropic's Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) scores higher.

Data last updated March 4, 2026

GPT-4o delivers more intelligence per dollar, while Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) leads on raw benchmark scores. Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) costs $0.15 per request vs $0.0225 for GPT-4o (at 5K input / 1K output tokens). Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) scores proportionally higher on mathematical reasoning (AIME: 0.56), while GPT-4o's scores skew toward general knowledge (MMLU-Pro: 0.75). The question is whether Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)'s higher scores justify the 7x price premium.

Benchmarks & Performance

Metric Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) GPT-4o
Intelligence Index 22.2 17.3
MMLU-Pro 0.9 0.8
GPQA 0.7 0.5
AIME 0.6 0.2
Output tokens/sec 36.2 116.8
Time to first token 1.34s 0.44s
Context window 1,000,000 128,000

Pricing per 1M Tokens

List prices as published by the provider. Not adjusted for token efficiency.

Metric Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) GPT-4o
Input price / 1M tokens $15.00 $2.50
Output price / 1M tokens $75.00 $10.00
Cache hit price / 1M tokens $1.50 $1.25

Intelligence vs Price

15 20 25 30 35 40 $0.002 $0.005 $0.01 $0.02 $0.05 $0.1 $0.2 Typical request cost (5K input + 1K output) Intelligence Index Gemini 2.5 Pro DeepSeek R1 0528 GPT-4.1 GPT-4.1 mini Claude 4 Sonnet... Claude 4.5 Sonn... Gemini 2.5 Flas... Grok 3 mini Rea... Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) GPT-4o
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) GPT-4o Other models

Value Analysis

Cost per IQ point based on a typical request of 5,000 input and 1,000 output tokens.

Cheaper (list price)

GPT-4o

Higher Benchmarks

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)

Better Value ($/IQ point)

GPT-4o

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)

$0.0068 / IQ point

GPT-4o

$0.0013 / IQ point

Frequently Asked Questions

How much cheaper is GPT-4o than Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)?

GPT-4o is dramatically cheaper — 7x less per request than Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning). GPT-4o is cheaper on both input ($2.5/M vs $15.0/M) and output ($10.0/M vs $75.0/M). At a fraction of the cost, GPT-4o saves significantly in production workloads. This comparison assumes a typical request of 5,000 input and 1,000 output tokens (5:1 ratio). Actual ratios vary by workload — chat and completion tasks typically run 2:1, code review around 3:1, document analysis and summarization 10:1 to 50:1, and embedding workloads are pure input with no output tokens.

How much does Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) outperform GPT-4o on benchmarks?

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) scores higher overall (22.2 vs 17.3). Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) leads on MMLU-Pro (0.86 vs 0.75), GPQA (0.7 vs 0.54), AIME (0.56 vs 0.15). Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) scores proportionally higher on AIME (mathematical reasoning) relative to its MMLU-Pro, while GPT-4o's scores are more weighted toward general knowledge. If mathematical reasoning matters, Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)'s AIME score of 0.56 gives it an edge.

How much faster is GPT-4o than Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)?

GPT-4o is significantly faster — 116.8 tokens per second vs Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) at 36.2 tokens per second. GPT-4o also starts generating sooner at 0.44s vs 1.34s time to first token. For interactive use cases, GPT-4o's speed advantage translates to noticeably lower latency.

How much more context can Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) handle than GPT-4o?

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) has a much larger context window — 1,000,000 tokens vs GPT-4o at 128,000 tokens. That's roughly 1,333 vs 170 pages of text. Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)'s window can handle entire codebases or book-length documents; GPT-4o works better for shorter inputs.

Is GPT-4o worth choosing over Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) on value alone?

GPT-4o offers dramatically better value — $0.0013 per intelligence point vs Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) at $0.0068. GPT-4o is cheaper, which offsets Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)'s higher benchmark scores to deliver more value per dollar. If raw benchmark scores matter less than cost for your use case, GPT-4o is the efficient choice.

Which model benefits more from prompt caching, Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) or GPT-4o?

With prompt caching, GPT-4o is dramatically cheaper — 5x less per request than Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning). Caching saves 45% on Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) and 28% on GPT-4o compared to standard input prices. Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) benefits more from caching. If your workload has repetitive prompts, Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)'s cache discount gives it a bigger cost advantage than list prices suggest.

Pricing verified against official vendor documentation. Updated daily. See our methodology.

Related Comparisons

Stop guessing. Start measuring.

Create an account, install the SDK, and see your first margin data in minutes.

See My Margin Data

No credit card required