Model Comparison

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-4.1 nano

Anthropic vs OpenAI

OpenAI's GPT-4.1 nano costs less per intelligence point, even though Anthropic's Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) scores higher.

Data last updated March 4, 2026

GPT-4.1 nano delivers more intelligence per dollar, while Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) leads on raw benchmark scores. Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) costs $0.03 per request vs $0.0009 for GPT-4.1 nano (at 5K input / 1K output tokens). GPT-4.1 nano generates tokens at 126/sec vs Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)'s 48/sec. The question is whether Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)'s higher scores justify the 33x price premium.

Benchmarks & Performance

Metric Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) GPT-4.1 nano
Intelligence Index 33.0 14.9
MMLU-Pro 0.8 0.7
GPQA 0.7 0.5
AIME 0.4 0.2
Output tokens/sec 48.5 125.7
Time to first token 1.03s 0.39s
Context window 200,000 1,047,576

Pricing per 1M Tokens

List prices as published by the provider. Not adjusted for token efficiency.

Metric Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) GPT-4.1 nano
Input price / 1M tokens $3.00 $0.10
Output price / 1M tokens $15.00 $0.40
Cache hit price / 1M tokens $0.30 $0.02

Intelligence vs Price

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 $0.001 $0.002 $0.005 $0.01 $0.02 $0.05 Typical request cost (5K input + 1K output) Intelligence Index Gemini 2.5 Pro DeepSeek R1 0528 GPT-4.1 GPT-4.1 mini Claude 4.5 Sonn... Gemini 2.5 Flas... Grok 3 mini Rea... Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) GPT-4.1 nano
Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) GPT-4.1 nano Other models

Value Analysis

Cost per IQ point based on a typical request of 5,000 input and 1,000 output tokens.

Cheaper (list price)

GPT-4.1 nano

Higher Benchmarks

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)

Better Value ($/IQ point)

GPT-4.1 nano

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)

$0.0009 / IQ point

GPT-4.1 nano

$0.00006 / IQ point

Frequently Asked Questions

How much cheaper is GPT-4.1 nano than Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)?

GPT-4.1 nano is dramatically cheaper — 33x less per request than Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning). GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper on both input ($0.1/M vs $3.0/M) and output ($0.4/M vs $15.0/M). At a fraction of the cost, GPT-4.1 nano saves significantly in production workloads. This comparison assumes a typical request of 5,000 input and 1,000 output tokens (5:1 ratio). Actual ratios vary by workload — chat and completion tasks typically run 2:1, code review around 3:1, document analysis and summarization 10:1 to 50:1, and embedding workloads are pure input with no output tokens.

How much does Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) outperform GPT-4.1 nano on benchmarks?

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) scores higher overall (33.0 vs 14.9). Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) leads on MMLU-Pro (0.84 vs 0.66), GPQA (0.68 vs 0.51), AIME (0.41 vs 0.24). If mathematical reasoning matters, Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)'s AIME score of 0.41 gives it an edge.

Which generates output faster, Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) or GPT-4.1 nano?

GPT-4.1 nano is 159% faster at 125.7 tokens per second compared to Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) at 48.5 tokens per second. GPT-4.1 nano also starts generating sooner at 0.39s vs 1.03s time to first token. The speed difference matters for chatbots but is less relevant in batch processing.

How much more context can GPT-4.1 nano handle than Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)?

GPT-4.1 nano has a much larger context window — 1,047,576 tokens vs Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) at 200,000 tokens. That's roughly 1,396 vs 266 pages of text. GPT-4.1 nano's window can handle entire codebases or book-length documents; Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) works better for shorter inputs.

Is GPT-4.1 nano worth choosing over Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) on value alone?

GPT-4.1 nano offers dramatically better value — $0.00006 per intelligence point vs Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) at $0.0009. GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper, which offsets Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)'s higher benchmark scores to deliver more value per dollar. If raw benchmark scores matter less than cost for your use case, GPT-4.1 nano is the efficient choice.

How does prompt caching affect Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) and GPT-4.1 nano pricing?

With prompt caching, GPT-4.1 nano is dramatically cheaper — 31x less per request than Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning). Caching saves 45% on Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) and 42% on GPT-4.1 nano compared to standard input prices. Both models benefit from caching at similar rates, so the uncached price comparison holds.

Pricing verified against official vendor documentation. Updated daily. See our methodology.

Related Comparisons

Stop guessing. Start measuring.

Create an account, install the SDK, and see your first margin data in minutes.

See My Margin Data

No credit card required